From: Egil H H <ehh.public@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Some problems with iterators
Date: Thu, 21 Aug 2014 00:06:03 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2014-08-21T00:06:03-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fef16ffd-7510-460e-a471-2474b713830e@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lt2jhi$qpv$1@speranza.aioe.org>
On Wednesday, August 20, 2014 6:48:53 PM UTC+2, Victor Porton wrote:
> Why Ada2012 does allow only type name for an iterator in for loops,
Please provide an example, or better yet, an RM reference, I can't find any for-loop that takes a type name for an iterator.
> not an iterator object?
But we can, RM 5.5.2(2/3).
> I think, it is a design mistake.
Clearly not.
> The following does not verify with GCC 4.9.1 (I think it is a compiler bug
> and have reported this bug in GCC Bugzilla):
What error do you get?
I believe the rest of your post was answered in this thread:
https://groups.google.com/forum/?authuser=0#!searchin/comp.lang.ada/porton$20$27class%7Csort:date/comp.lang.ada/J-orbhzFZ-8/kF9YuqKIQNQJ
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-08-21 7:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-08-20 16:48 Some problems with iterators Victor Porton
2014-08-21 7:06 ` Egil H H [this message]
2014-08-21 16:34 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-21 16:46 ` Victor Porton
2014-08-21 23:01 ` Randy Brukardt
2014-08-22 7:59 ` Egil H H
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox