comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: roderick.chapman@googlemail.com
Subject: Re: Newbie question: SPARK verification condition on member of private record
Date: Thu, 2 Apr 2009 11:09:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-04-02T11:09:44-07:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <fda46992-7b1c-4b6c-a483-acd3b755748c@f19g2000vbf.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: XQOei4CZgN1JJw9Y@diphi.demon.co.uk

I concur with Phil.  It's almost _always_ better to write
aggregate expressions and use the array/record update notation
in postconditions than using field-by-field assignments
and equalities.

e.g.

Do write

 A := T'(X, Y, Z);

Don't write

 A.F1 := X;
 A.F2 := Y;
 A.F3 := Z;

Also...for just

 A.F1 := X;

the correct post-condition would be

 --# post A = A~[F1 => X];

which defines the final value of the whole object, rather than

 --# post A.F1 = X;

which defines the final value of A.F1 but leaves the other
2 fields unspecified.  Further explanation of all this in the
"Generation of VCs" manual.

 - Rod Chapman, SPARK Team




  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-02 18:09 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-01 19:38 Newbie question: SPARK verification condition on member of private record Tim Rowe
2009-04-01 21:04 ` JP Thornley
2009-04-01 23:50   ` Tim Rowe
2009-04-02  9:00     ` JP Thornley
2009-04-02 12:00       ` Tim Rowe
2009-04-02 15:22         ` JP Thornley
2009-04-02 18:09           ` roderick.chapman [this message]
2009-04-03 11:26             ` Tim Rowe
2009-04-02 23:58           ` Tim Rowe
2009-04-03 13:36             ` JP Thornley
2009-04-06 11:49               ` Tim Rowe
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox