From: Olivier Henley <olivier.henley@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: protobuff for Ada
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2019 07:04:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2019-01-01T07:04:29-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc10a6e0-c406-4421-98c7-d1a352e046c6@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <obFWD.113356$xc1.21223@fx08.fr7>
> * Its backed by a large corporation.
true
> * The technology is well known.
true
> * 99.9% of the programming population think that they are the salvation
> to serialization.
true, until they switch to Cap'N Proto ... or any other one. We may be good for 10 years though.
> And on top.
> * The are significantly more then one project where the lack of protobuf
> support has ruled out Ada as implementation technology.
very true (grpc which would give a low hanging DGraph(https://dgraph.io/) Ada client)
> /And my intent was to eliminate at least the last points even if the
> technology is inferior.
+1
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-01-01 15:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-12-28 18:57 protobuff for Ada Per Sandberg
2018-12-29 5:53 ` Shark8
2018-12-29 11:05 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-12-31 16:55 ` Olivier Henley
2018-12-31 17:59 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-01-01 14:56 ` Olivier Henley
2019-01-02 6:57 ` G. B.
2019-01-02 10:02 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2019-01-01 8:05 ` Per Sandberg
2019-01-01 15:04 ` Olivier Henley [this message]
2018-12-29 13:01 ` joakimds
2018-12-29 14:52 ` Per Sandberg
2018-12-30 0:27 ` joakimds
2018-12-30 0:28 ` joakimds
2018-12-30 6:21 ` Per Sandberg
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox