From: hesobreira <herrsobreira@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Static vs Dynamic binding and its effect on maintenance of software
Date: Sat, 3 Jan 2009 11:07:29 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2009-01-03T11:07:29-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fc004232-9331-4b59-94e7-2d836bdb2ae9@q30g2000prq.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: CZ17l.4150$jZ1.3155@flpi144.ffdc.sbc.com
On Jan 1, 12:41 pm, "Nasser Abbasi" <n...@12000.org> wrote:
> From "Object-Oriented programming and Java", ISBN 981-308-396-4
>
> I am posting this on Ada group for comments, since Ada is well known for its
> static binding more than any other language I know.
Really? Ada allows dynamic binding as well via 'Class attribute.
>
> "Static binding is limited and may lead to difficulty in software
> maintenance. Dynamic binding, on the other hand, provides design flexibility
> and may enhance software maintainability"
One can say that software that is adaptable to changes is maintainable
in the sense that you don't have to change implemented code, just
write the necessary part that handles the change, for example due to a
new requirement.
Hugo
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-01-03 19:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-01-01 11:41 Static vs Dynamic binding and its effect on maintenance of software Nasser Abbasi
2009-01-01 13:57 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2009-01-01 14:41 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-01-03 19:07 ` hesobreira [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox