From: Ludovic Brenta <ludovic@ludovic-brenta.org>
Subject: Re: On database interface libraries for Ada
Date: Fri, 30 Apr 2010 03:31:33 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2010-04-30T03:31:33-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fbbd05a0-d821-420c-ba18-290c57f5bd4d@37g2000yqm.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1t9si695ko28h$.mh8uo0i4xh9j.dlg@40tude.net
Dmitry A. Kazakov wrote:
> On Thu, 29 Apr 2010 06:41:32 -0700 (PDT), Ludovic Brenta wrote:
>> http://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Ada_Programming/Libraries/Database
>
> What about a separate section for embedded / single file data bases e.g.
> SQLite, Berkeley etc? From my point of view it is a quite different topic
> from the bindings to/as DBMS clients.
On the one hand I think that's a valid distinction. On the other,
such a split would lead to duplicate information since, for example,
GNADE, QtAda and gnatcoll support both embedded and client-server
databases. Also, this is a property of the target database engine,
not necessarily of the Ada binding. Maybe adding a note that SQLite
is in-process (linked either statically or dynamically) would be
sufficient. (I do not know of a Berkeley DB binding, yet...)
--
Ludovic Brenta.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-04-30 10:31 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-04-29 13:41 On database interface libraries for Ada Ludovic Brenta
2010-04-29 13:51 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-04-29 14:22 ` Tero Koskinen
2010-04-30 6:48 ` xavier grave
2010-04-30 7:27 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-04-30 9:28 ` Ludovic Brenta
2010-04-30 10:01 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-04-30 10:08 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-04-30 10:31 ` Ludovic Brenta [this message]
2010-04-30 12:47 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox