From: hfrumblefoot@yahoo.com (Hambut)
Subject: Re: Which OO is in ??
Date: 3 Aug 2001 13:28:54 -0700
Date: 2001-08-03T20:28:54+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb75c450.0108031228.282f899a@posting.google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3b6a97c5@pull.gecm.com
"Martin Dowie" <martin.dowie@nospam.baesystems.com> wrote in message news:<3b6a97c5@pull.gecm.com>...
> Hambut <hfrumblefoot@yahoo.com> wrote in message
> news:f75c450.0108030127.6c60f9a2@posting.google.com...
> > I think it's probably even more straight forward for new projects now.
> [snip]
> > sub-set. Which may mean that the sub-set is subverted, and that the
> > benefits you should gain from the sub-set are not gained.
>
> I think the original poster is asking what method he would use
> together with UML (if that were the notation chosen).
>
Fair enough.
It is still probably important to think carefully about how the
notation maps to the implementation language before use ( OK so this
is probably almost a 'how to suck eggs' kind of thing - but for a
project using a sub-set I would guess that it's very easy to not think
this issue).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-08-03 20:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-08-02 16:51 Which OO is in ?? Paul Foster
2001-08-02 17:10 ` Ted Dennison
2001-08-02 18:02 ` Paul Foster
2001-08-03 9:27 ` Hambut
2001-08-03 12:33 ` Martin Dowie
2001-08-03 13:31 ` Ted Dennison
2001-08-03 20:28 ` Hambut [this message]
2001-08-06 13:25 ` Martin Dowie
2001-08-03 18:00 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-08-04 10:30 ` Shayne Flint
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox