From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: non record limited type
Date: Wed, 21 Feb 2018 16:09:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2018-02-21T16:09:35-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <fb3b3119-8229-4e34-8b22-7043f47e7b07@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b3ec45c7-2855-424c-88d7-886f6d509c0f@googlegroups.com>
... Splendid. Did you have to search for me, or merely recalled (!) ?
Anyway, I just learnt a lot, thanks a lot
Infos scattered like that aren't the easiest ones to gather...
Yet, we still wonder why "type FOO is limited INTEGER" is not legal. Would be useful.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-02-22 0:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-02-21 15:58 non record limited type Mehdi Saada
2018-02-21 21:42 ` Jere
2018-02-21 22:29 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-02-21 23:08 ` Jere
2018-02-21 23:14 ` Jere
2018-02-22 0:09 ` Mehdi Saada [this message]
2018-02-22 0:26 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-02-22 2:57 ` Jere
2018-02-22 16:45 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2018-02-22 17:06 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-02-22 7:56 ` Simon Wright
2018-02-22 1:20 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-02-22 1:29 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-02-22 8:25 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-02-22 23:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-02-23 8:58 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox