From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Subject: why "unconstrained subtype in component declaration" while said component given default value ?
Date: Sat, 26 May 2018 14:03:22 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2018-05-26T14:03:22-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f9a3c91e-03d0-4053-827b-170ba762dddf@googlegroups.com> (raw)
Hello.
Why is this case not allowed ? Is there really an implementation issue here ? I doubt so. Why should it be any different from the non-issue of initializing variables of unconstrained subtypes vs declaring uninitialized variables of constrained subtypes ?
type A (N: Positive) is record
II : Integer;
Chaine : String := Give_String(N);
end record;
Also, there's something that would be really cool, and I'm curious why it could not be allowed: Why can't we provide a private constrained subtype, of an inconstrained private type ?
package III is
type A (<>) is private;
subtype B is A; -- should be a constrained subtype
private
function Donne_String (N : Positive) return String;
type A (N: Positive) is record
II : Integer;
Chaine : String(1..N) := Give_String(N);
end record;
end III;
next reply other threads:[~2018-05-26 21:03 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-26 21:03 Mehdi Saada [this message]
2018-05-26 21:40 ` why "unconstrained subtype in component declaration" while said component given default value ? Jere
2018-05-26 22:11 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-26 23:55 ` Jere
2018-05-27 0:14 ` Jere
2018-05-27 0:29 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-27 0:45 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-27 17:15 ` Shark8
2018-05-27 17:30 ` AdaMagica
2018-05-27 18:17 ` Shark8
2018-05-29 1:28 ` AdaMagica
2018-05-29 17:20 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-27 7:45 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2018-05-26 23:41 ` Shark8
2018-05-27 7:07 ` Simon Wright
2018-05-27 17:22 ` Shark8
2018-05-27 12:24 ` Mehdi Saada
2018-05-29 22:28 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox