From: brbarkstrom@gmail.com
Subject: Re: A matter of interest.
Date: Sun, 30 Nov 2014 09:07:41 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2014-11-30T09:07:41-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f99e6781-f877-47cb-93bd-0036791be090@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <m5ffcl$hvq$1@dont-email.me>
On Sunday, November 30, 2014 11:08:06 AM UTC-5, björn lundin wrote:
> On 2014-11-30 14:24, Austin Obyrne wrote:
>
> >
> > But surely the compiler does a bit-by-bit job ?
>
> no
>
> Year : Integer := 2014;
>
> will compile just as
>
> YEAR : INTEGER := 2014;
>
> and
>
> YEAR : INTEGER := 2014;
>
> but they are of course different when represented
> as files.
>
>
> --
> Björn
I do not believe that a new cryptographic algorithm can be trusted
until it has been published and attacked by competent cryptanalysts.
The classic text is
Schneier, B., 1996: Applied Cryptography: Protocols, Algorithms,
and Source Code in C, John Wiley & Sons, New York, NY
If the algorithm hasn't been published, the usual term would be
"security by obscurity." It doesn't work.
Bruce B.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-11-30 17:07 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-11-30 12:10 A matter of interest Austin Obyrne
2014-11-30 12:49 ` Simon Wright
2014-11-30 13:24 ` Austin Obyrne
2014-11-30 16:09 ` Björn Lundin
2014-11-30 17:07 ` brbarkstrom [this message]
2014-11-30 18:12 ` Simon Wright
2014-11-30 19:56 ` brbarkstrom
2014-12-01 16:24 ` Denis McMahon
2014-12-01 20:29 ` Austin Obyrne
2014-12-01 23:49 ` Jeffrey Carter
2014-12-02 2:24 ` David Botton
2014-12-02 7:52 ` mrvmurray
2014-12-02 2:43 ` Austin Obyrne
2014-12-03 3:40 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2014-12-01 19:36 ` Eryndlia Mavourneen
2014-12-01 19:48 ` mrvmurray
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox