From: "Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)" <yannick_duchene@yahoo.fr>
Subject: Re: Indirect visibility of private part in child packages
Date: Thu, 4 Jun 2009 09:33:06 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-06-04T09:33:06-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8f1e422-0776-4bce-ad75-563a8c825e01@s16g2000vbp.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 94b5b0e6-eb58-48e7-b140-ed5564e0b344@o14g2000vbo.googlegroups.com
On 4 juin, 18:06, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> So the compiler is correct to reject your original program. However,
> I think Ludovic's fix (using a type conversion, actually a view
> conversion) should work, and it's a compiler bug if that is rejected.
I've done an error in my prior : T1_Type(Item).Low_Level_Data finally
works fine.
By the way, thanks for this clean explanation (and I gonna have a
further look at 7.3x)
prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-04 16:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-06-04 5:45 Indirect visibility of private part in child packages Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-06-04 7:50 ` Ludovic Brenta
2009-06-04 11:47 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-06-04 13:22 ` Robert A Duff
2009-06-04 14:04 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2009-06-04 16:06 ` Adam Beneschan
2009-06-04 16:33 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne) [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox