From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Exception_Occurence and language designers
Date: Mon, 4 Dec 2017 06:00:23 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2017-12-04T06:00:23-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f8e70027-fc10-4412-b6a7-0c55ada9b4b5@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <lypo7uptae.fsf@pushface.org>
but an "exception" is also an exception that might happen, at least when it's just declared. I still wonder why the same subprograms can take both Exception_Identity and Exception_Occurence, but not objects of the mere "exception" type. Mere exceptions are declared, but never taken as parameters like normal type instances are, like instances of Exception_Identity are.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-12-04 14:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-12-04 11:17 Exception_Occurence and language designers Mehdi Saada
2017-12-04 12:32 ` Simon Wright
2017-12-04 14:00 ` Mehdi Saada [this message]
2017-12-04 14:31 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-12-04 20:27 ` G. B.
2017-12-04 20:55 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-12-05 0:16 ` G. B.
2017-12-05 8:35 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-12-05 20:05 ` G. B.
2017-12-05 20:48 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2017-12-04 17:43 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox