From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Ada 202x and square brackets
Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2019 04:37:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2019-02-22T04:37:35-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f6e597b0-e0d4-45ed-8233-258655508387@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <q4onqr$9rv$1@dont-email.me>
Am Freitag, 22. Februar 2019 12:53:00 UTC+1 schrieb J-P. Rosen:
> There are cases where you want to mix for clarity:
> ([1,2], [3,4])
I do not see that this enhances clarity, but rather raises questions about the difference.
I see new coding standards emerge saying: Use [] only for containers, not arrays. (I've seen lots of stupid rules in such coding standards.) So this would then be an array aggregate of container subaggregates.
> So what would your rule be?
Prhaps something like J.2(4)?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-02-22 12:37 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-02-19 22:01 Ada 202x and square brackets Lucretia
2019-02-19 22:36 ` Lucretia
2019-02-20 14:32 ` Jere
2019-02-20 14:38 ` Jere
2019-02-20 14:58 ` Lucretia
2019-02-20 23:47 ` Randy Brukardt
2019-02-21 4:27 ` Lucretia
2019-02-22 0:24 ` Randy Brukardt
2019-02-22 10:34 ` AdaMagica
2019-02-22 11:53 ` J-P. Rosen
2019-02-22 12:37 ` AdaMagica [this message]
2019-02-22 16:56 ` J-P. Rosen
2019-02-22 17:09 ` AdaMagica
2019-02-22 22:18 ` Randy Brukardt
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox