From: christoph.grein@eurocopter.com
Subject: Re: Another problem with "interface"
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2009 03:54:43 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2009-02-16T03:54:43-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f5f612fa-93d0-4a2b-a8c6-218742d7d686@t13g2000yqc.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 49994281$0$31336$9b4e6d93@newsspool4.arcor-online.net
> Uhm, I think that, still, you can call functions
> that will assign the (already existing) return
> objcect. Which was, IIUC, the point of coining the
> word "constructor function".
Indeed, construct-in-place is the term, I forgot :-(
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-16 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-16 9:53 Another problem with "interface" Robert_Matthews
2009-02-16 10:26 ` christoph.grein
2009-02-16 10:40 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-02-16 11:27 ` Robert_Matthews
2009-02-16 11:45 ` Egil Høvik
2009-02-16 11:54 ` christoph.grein [this message]
2009-02-16 13:29 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2009-02-16 13:56 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-02-17 16:28 ` Robert_Matthews
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox