Re: limited allocated classwide types

[Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>]

On Nov 3, 5:30 pm, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com> wrote:
> On Nov 3, 4:35 pm, Simon Belmont <sbelmont...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> > More vexxing is that I can alter what happens in the presumably
> > incorrect case simply by adding, removing, and reordering the
> > functions in the spec (which smacks heavily of a mixed up vtable, to
> > excuse the c++ terminology), which the second response more-or-less
> > supports.
>
> Although there's no official Ada terminology, I think, a paragraph in
> the AARM calls it the "dispatch table".  We Ada people tend to prefer
> readable English over incomprehensible abbreviations.

Sorry, I missed that you had already used the "correct" term
previously.

                                 -- Adam