From: "Dan'l Miller" <optikos@verizon.net>
Subject: Re: Why not Coq2Ada program extraction?
Date: Tue, 1 May 2018 10:30:46 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2018-05-01T10:30:46-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <f10e977b-8a43-42fc-930e-a995b1f7e06b@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pc982i$p9v$2@dont-email.me>
On Tuesday, May 1, 2018 at 3:21:39 AM UTC-5, Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> On 05/01/2018 05:38 AM, Dan'l Miller wrote:
> >
> > Why hasn't anyone ever developed Ada extraction from Coq proofs? Perhaps the coq2rust
> > work-in-progress can serve as a guide and/or inspiration for an analogous coq2ada.
>
> Sounds interesting. When do you expect to have it finished?
The better question is when do I have enough •funding• of some sort to •start• in earnest?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2018-05-01 17:30 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-05-01 3:38 Why not Coq2Ada program extraction? Dan'l Miller
2018-05-01 3:59 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-01 6:59 ` Chris M Moore
2018-05-01 7:41 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-01 11:44 ` Jere
2018-05-02 16:47 ` G.B.
2018-05-02 17:12 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-01 8:21 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2018-05-01 17:30 ` Dan'l Miller [this message]
2018-05-01 9:12 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-07 2:30 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-07 2:37 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-07 3:50 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-07 4:01 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-07 4:20 ` Paul Rubin
2018-05-07 16:33 ` Dan'l Miller
2018-05-07 13:27 ` Dan'l Miller
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox