From: Ted Dennison<dennison@telepath.com>
Subject: Re: A Record Interpretation of an Array
Date: Tue, 29 May 2001 13:34:03 GMT
Date: 2001-05-29T13:34:03+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ezNQ6.3604$rn5.196109@www.newsranger.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3B12C9E0.5E9B06C8@earthlink.net
In article <3B12C9E0.5E9B06C8@earthlink.net>, Marc A. Criley says...
>Is it reasonable to think this conversion (going either way) would give
>sensible results? Is there a stronger basis for that answer than a
>naive "reasonable to think"?
In my book it is Wrong (with a capital 'W') to ever depend on the size and/or
representation of a type without explicitly specifying it using the appropriate
rep clauses.
---
T.E.D. homepage - http://www.telepath.com/dennison/Ted/TED.html
home email - mailto:dennison@telepath.com
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-05-29 13:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-05-28 22:53 A Record Interpretation of an Array Marc A. Criley
2001-05-29 3:29 ` Jeffrey Carter
2001-05-29 13:34 ` Ted Dennison [this message]
2001-05-29 14:16 ` Marin David Condic
2001-05-31 0:55 ` Keith Thompson
2001-05-31 12:47 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-06-01 1:22 ` Keith Thompson
2001-06-01 0:14 ` Mark
2001-06-01 8:45 ` Ehud Lamm
2001-06-01 12:39 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-06-01 18:20 ` Tucker Taft
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox