From: Gary Scott <garylscott@sbcglobal.net>
Subject: Re: state of Ada / Paige memo
Date: Thu, 30 Aug 2007 19:48:04 -0500
Date: 2007-08-30T19:48:04-05:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ezJBi.569$4J3.85@newssvr22.news.prodigy.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <KJrBi.63134$Xa3.51257@attbi_s22>
Jeffrey R. Carter wrote:
> Ed Falis wrote:
>
>> By the way, how many of the "overall life cycle cost analyses"
>> recommended by the memo to decide the right language do you think
>> actually happened in more than a desultory fashion? I'm not aware of
>> any, and I've worked for Ada vendors for the last 25 years.
>
>
> The fact that this requirement is not enforced is the true evidence of
> the DOD's attitude towards Ada and SW eng in general.
I deal with DOD a lot. I don't think this is generally true. Industry
rebellion had something to do with it (ready trained supply of C
programmers (er hackers)).
>
--
Gary Scott
mailto:garylscott@sbcglobal dot net
Fortran Library: http://www.fortranlib.com
Support the Original G95 Project: http://www.g95.org
-OR-
Support the GNU GFortran Project: http://gcc.gnu.org/fortran/index.html
If you want to do the impossible, don't hire an expert because he knows
it can't be done.
-- Henry Ford
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-08-31 0:48 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-08-29 20:46 re:state of Ada / Paige memo Ed Falis
2007-08-30 4:30 ` state " Jeffrey R. Carter
2007-08-31 0:48 ` Gary Scott [this message]
2007-08-31 1:45 ` jimmaureenrogers
2007-09-01 2:16 ` Brian Gaffney
2007-08-31 11:36 ` anon
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox