From: emery@grebyn.com (David Emery)
Subject: Re: POSIX bindings for GNAT
Date: 1996/03/28
Date: 1996-03-28T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <emery-2703961944120001@line256.nwm.mindlink.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wgcspevmm1w.fsf@roosevelt.logicon.com
In article <wgcspevmm1w.fsf@roosevelt.logicon.com>,
shochat@roosevelt.logicon.com (David Shochat) wrote:
> In article <4j8ubv$15j@news.sanders.lockheed.com>
> "Lowell S. Von Ruden" <lvonrude@rapnet.sanders.lockheed.com> writes:
>
> > Are there any POSIX bindings for GNAT? --
>
> ftp://cs.nyu.edu/pub/gnat/contrib/forest/forest-1.4beta.tar.gz
>
> Unfortunately, there are some code fixes that need to be made to
> make this compile with the current (3.03) version of gnat.
> --
> David Shochat
> dshochat@logicon.com shochat@roosevelt.logicon.com
It's not clear to me that GNAT/Forest are compliant with
IEEE Std 1003.5-1992/ISO 14519.1:1995...
Does Forest claim to be complaint with the standard? Of course, there is
no validation suite for POSIX/Ada, but the standard does contain a clear
statement of what 'conformance' means, even if it is not formally tested.
dave
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1996-03-28 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1996-03-26 0:00 POSIX bindings for GNAT Lowell S. Von Ruden
1996-03-26 0:00 ` David Shochat
1996-03-28 0:00 ` David Emery [this message]
1996-03-28 0:00 ` John Hutchison x2141
1996-03-29 0:00 ` David Emery
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox