From: Maciej Sobczak <no.spam@no.spam.com>
Subject: Type declarations problematic?
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:17:35 +0100
Date: 2006-11-24T09:17:35+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ek69qv$oo0$1@cernne03.cern.ch> (raw)
Hi,
http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/10/12.html
"[it] seems to be that it’s explicit typing, where the programmer is
asked to declare the type of things, that leads to most of the problems.
[...] it’s starting to look like type declarations are one of those
accidental difficulties that good programming languages can eliminate."
It is obvious that there is a place for dynamically typed languages, but
the above statements seem to be a bit too far-fetched. Do they mean that
"typeless" languages will just suck some of the Java audience (fine for
me), or is it maybe a more general problem that will drive the evolution
of programming languages further away from strongly typed systems?
Do you plan a switch to Ruby? ;-)
Comments are welcome.
--
Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/
Programming : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/
next reply other threads:[~2006-11-24 8:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-24 8:17 Maciej Sobczak [this message]
2006-11-24 8:52 ` Type declarations problematic? Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-11-24 14:41 ` Robert A Duff
2007-01-04 6:30 ` adaworks
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox