comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Sobczak <no.spam@no.spam.com>
Subject: Type declarations problematic?
Date: Fri, 24 Nov 2006 09:17:35 +0100
Date: 2006-11-24T09:17:35+01:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ek69qv$oo0$1@cernne03.cern.ch> (raw)

Hi,

http://www.joelonsoftware.com/items/2006/10/12.html

"[it] seems to be that it’s explicit typing, where the programmer is 
asked to declare the type of things, that leads to most of the problems.

[...] it’s starting to look like type declarations are one of those 
accidental difficulties that good programming languages can eliminate."


It is obvious that there is a place for dynamically typed languages, but 
the above statements seem to be a bit too far-fetched. Do they mean that 
"typeless" languages will just suck some of the Java audience (fine for 
me), or is it maybe a more general problem that will drive the evolution 
of programming languages further away from strongly typed systems?
Do you plan a switch to Ruby? ;-)

Comments are welcome.

-- 
Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/
Programming    : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/



             reply	other threads:[~2006-11-24  8:17 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-11-24  8:17 Maciej Sobczak [this message]
2006-11-24  8:52 ` Type declarations problematic? Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-11-24 14:41 ` Robert A Duff
2007-01-04  6:30 ` adaworks
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox