From: Wilhelm Spickermann <klurs.20.unbenutzbar@spamgourmet.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT-2005
Date: Fri, 10 Nov 2006 16:13:42 +0100
Date: 2006-11-10T16:13:42+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ej24v7$1len$1@ulysses.news.tiscali.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1163141479.498169.10580@b28g2000cwb.googlegroups.com
Hi,
rashmi wrote:
> I want to understand why GNAT has such a strange response, that
> is, why it does not report "function undefined" for the former
> case.
Perhaps you misunderstood the purpose of the ads-file. It only
defines the interface to the outside world and not everything
that is needed in the body. Functions which are not mentioned in
the ads-file but defined in the adb-file are not undefined; they
are defined and can be used in the body. They are just not part
of the services provided to the rest of the world.
Wilhelm
prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-11-10 15:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-11-10 6:51 GNAT-2005 rashmi
2006-11-10 10:52 ` GNAT-2005 Georg Bauhaus
2006-11-10 13:37 ` GNAT-2005 Stephen Leake
2006-11-10 16:56 ` GNAT-2005 Adam Beneschan
2006-11-12 18:55 ` GNAT-2005 Martin Krischik
2006-11-13 20:35 ` GNAT-2005 Simon Wright
2006-11-13 22:12 ` GNAT-2005 Jean-Pierre Rosen
2006-11-13 22:25 ` GNAT-2005 Georg Bauhaus
2006-11-13 23:41 ` GNAT-2005 Björn Persson
2006-11-14 7:16 ` GNAT-2005 Pascal Obry
2006-11-15 22:57 ` GNAT-2005 Simon Wright
2006-11-10 15:13 ` Wilhelm Spickermann [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox