From: droiddermo@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Ada for the next bare metal project?
Date: Mon, 16 Feb 2015 23:56:35 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2015-02-16T23:56:35-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ef104da8-968f-4448-a233-29c583c7e086@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1743421605445817834.832937laguest-archeia.com@nntp.aioe.org>
> I have a tool chain built, apart from x86_64-elf-gdb as apparently this has
> never been supported. So I'll be using the system one. I can provide you
> with it and the basics for a zero footprint runtime.
As for toolchain, I think I'll just go with mingw-w64 build (builds both x86 and
x64 code), put all code in one section and cut it out with objdump. But I'd like
to take a look at your zero footprint profile. What language features are
missing, if I use zero footprint profile?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-02-17 7:56 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 7+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-02-16 16:40 Ada for the next bare metal project? droiddermo
2015-02-16 17:37 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2015-02-16 22:19 ` Luke A. Guest
2015-02-17 7:56 ` droiddermo [this message]
2015-02-17 23:42 ` Luke A. Guest
2015-02-18 10:29 ` Frédéric Praca
2015-02-23 22:45 ` brbarkstrom
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox