From: hreba <f_hreba@yahoo.com.br>
Subject: Re: Inconsistency in gtkada (Override_Color)
Date: Mon, 23 Jan 2017 11:17:06 +0100
Date: 2017-01-23T11:17:06+01:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eem3h1Fslp7U1@mid.individual.net> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <ly7f5njmvy.fsf@pushface.org>
On 01/22/2017 01:32 PM, Simon Wright wrote:
> hreba <f_hreba@yahoo.com.br> writes:
>
>> I found an inconsistency in Gtkada 2015.
>>
>> A procedure specification there is
>>
>> procedure Override_Color
>> (Widget : not null access Gtk_Widget_Record;
>> State : Gtk.Enums.Gtk_State_Flags;
>> Color : Gdk.RGBA.Gdk_RGBA);
>>
>> The last comment line reads:
>> "Since: gtk+ 3.0 "state": the state for which to set the color
>> "color": the color to assign, or null to undo the effect of previous
>> calls to Gtk.Widget.Override_Color".
>>
>> This is a copy from GTK where the color parameter is indeed a pointer,
>> and not a record as Gdk.RGBA.Gdk_RGBA. Several other
>> override-procedures show the same inconsistency between specification
>> and description.
>>
>> Any workaround for resetting the color?
>
> The same inconsistency is present in the Github version[1]. I suppose an
> issue should be raised.
>
> Looks to me as though you are supposed to use Gdk.RGBA.Null_RGBA (which
> gets translated internally into the needed null).
>
> There are also White_RGBA, Black_RGBA.
>
> [1] https://github.com/AdaCore/gtkada
>
Thanks for the hint.
Should I do something about raising an issue?
--
Frank Hrebabetzky +49 / 6355 / 989 5070
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-23 10:17 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-22 11:01 Inconsistency in gtkada (Override_Color) hreba
2017-01-22 12:32 ` Simon Wright
2017-01-23 10:17 ` hreba [this message]
2017-01-23 10:38 ` Simon Wright
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox