Re: GNAT GPL 2009 for Mac OS X (Snow Leopard)

[sjw <simon.j.wright@mac.com>]

On Dec 23, 5:18 pm, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
> On 23/12/2009 14:26, in article
> 68e6e09a-9f02-4fd4-a87c-d1c43dd10...@27g2000yqr.googlegroups.com, "sjw"
> <simon.j.wri...@mac.com> wrote:
> > On Dec 23, 3:29 am, "(see below)" <yaldni...@blueyonder.co.uk> wrote:
[...]
> >> What on earth has happened for GNAT to regress so badly in the face of what
> >> is often described as a tidying-up and performance release of OS X?
>
> > I don't know either, because here it compiles without complaint at -O
> > {0,1,2,3}!
>
> Hmm. Interesting ...
> What could account for the difference?
> Do you have any other versions of GNAT installed in that testing
> environment?

Several! though I'd be surprised if any of them got invoked. Will
check further.