From: "chris.danx" <chris.danx@ntlworld.com>
Subject: rep clause confusion
Date: Tue, 1 Jan 2002 01:25:03 -0000
Date: 2002-01-01T01:25:03+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ed8Y7.27607$4x4.3341820@news2-win.server.ntlworld.com> (raw)
Hi,
I've been looking at rep clauses(?), for laying seg descriptors for the x86,
and one thing confuses me.
for some_type
use record
abc at 0 range 0..7;
def at 1 range 0..7;
end record;
The 'at' bit confuses me. Does this mean the storage element (numbered from
zero)? If so that means, abc spans storage element zero bits 0..7 and def
spans storage element 1 bits 0..7. Is this correct?
Happy New Year,
Chris
next reply other threads:[~2002-01-01 1:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 3+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-01 1:25 chris.danx [this message]
2002-01-01 5:23 ` rep clause confusion Ted Dennison
2002-01-03 16:24 ` Jerry Petrey
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox