From: Martin <martin.dowie@btopenworld.com>
Subject: Re: GNAT GPL 2009
Date: Tue, 24 Mar 2009 02:12:53 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2009-03-24T02:12:53-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec8fcd56-9506-40f5-b077-585557cc3a48@b16g2000yqb.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 4h%xl.78559$4m1.41472@bgtnsc05-news.ops.worldnet.att.net
On 24 Mar, 06:42, a...@anon.org (anon) wrote:
> I was talking about the files in gnat-gpl-2008-src.tgz which contains
> GPRMAKE.
>
> Since Robert Duff states that GPRMAKE is obsolete then why is GPRMAKE
> still there?
Backwards compatibility...same as Annex J. Can you image the hassle
and bad-will you'd generate with your customers by just 'pulling' a
tool?
Cheers
-- Martin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-03-24 9:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-03-19 19:49 GNAT GPL 2009 Martyn Pike
2009-03-19 23:01 ` roderick.chapman
2009-03-20 6:44 ` Martyn Pike
2009-03-20 2:51 ` anon
2009-03-23 8:18 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2009-03-23 10:07 ` anon
2009-03-23 10:28 ` ficorax
2009-03-23 21:11 ` anon
2009-03-23 21:25 ` Georg Bauhaus
2009-03-24 6:42 ` anon
2009-03-24 7:28 ` ficorax
2009-03-24 9:12 ` Martin [this message]
2009-03-25 0:37 ` anon
2009-03-25 7:53 ` Martin
2009-03-25 19:32 ` anon
2009-03-25 21:32 ` sjw
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox