From: Shark8 <onewingedshark@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Vector (container) initialization: the schizophrenic ampersand
Date: Fri, 18 May 2012 11:55:44 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2012-05-18T11:55:44-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ec0f19ed-e243-40b1-99a7-a27351307316@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <wcc7gw9ipio.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com>
On Friday, May 18, 2012 8:31:59 AM UTC-5, Robert A Duff wrote:
>
> IMHO, a qualified expression is the elegant (and usual)
> way to resolve ambiguities. Renaming "&" to be "+" just
> seems confusing, to me.
>
> - Bob
Isn't that the whole point of having the qualified expression, to tell the compiler "this is the type for this ambiguous operation"?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2012-05-18 18:55 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2012-05-17 20:20 Vector (container) initialization: the schizophrenic ampersand Marius Amado-Alves
2012-05-17 20:24 ` Jeffrey Carter
2012-05-17 20:26 ` Pascal Obry
2012-05-17 23:33 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-05-18 6:34 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2012-05-18 6:51 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2012-05-18 13:31 ` Robert A Duff
2012-05-18 18:55 ` Shark8 [this message]
2012-05-18 22:44 ` Robert A Duff
2012-05-19 9:03 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2012-05-19 16:15 ` Robert A Duff
2012-05-21 16:02 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-05-21 17:04 ` Robert A Duff
2012-05-21 17:57 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-05-21 15:57 ` Adam Beneschan
2012-05-19 9:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox