From: Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de>
Subject: Re: Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada
Date: Sat, 05 Aug 2006 23:25:49 +0200
Date: 2006-08-05T23:25:49+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eb32ct$7u2$1@online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 1154807226.567733.111380@p79g2000cwp.googlegroups.com
"Steve Whalen" <SteveWhalen001@hotmail.com> writes:
> While I am a big supporter of open source, in the real world, GPL
> without GMGPL on appropriate units _does_ mean essentially no
> commercial development will be done with that GPL only compiler /
> library / toolkit.
And we will see if GPL libraries give a significant boost to free
software development over GMGPL libraries. I'd say
non-free development tools don't harm the development of free
software. There are 20000 Java projects on Sourceforge vs. 110 Ada
projects. Maybe Ada catches up now than the libs are GPL?
--
Michael Bode
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-08-05 21:25 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-29 10:34 Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada Yves Bailly
2006-07-29 12:35 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-29 17:03 ` Preben Randhol
2006-07-29 17:44 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-07-29 21:50 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-29 18:17 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-29 19:11 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-07-29 14:24 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-31 20:57 ` Yves Bailly
2006-08-01 2:08 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-08-03 7:51 ` Rob Norris
2006-08-01 11:35 ` Philippe Bertin
2006-08-01 21:55 ` Yves Bailly
2006-08-05 19:47 ` Steve Whalen
2006-08-05 21:25 ` Michael Bode [this message]
2006-08-06 9:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox