From: Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de>
Subject: Re: Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada
Date: Sat, 29 Jul 2006 23:50:05 +0200
Date: 2006-07-29T23:50:05+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <eagl6d$ifr$1@online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: mailman.12.1154192651.32700.comp.lang.ada@ada-france.org
Preben Randhol <randhol+cla2@pvv.org> writes:
> Does it matter if QT4Ada is GMGPL when QT is GPL? I mean shouldn't
> QT4Ada then be dual licensed so that whether one use the QT GPL or
> non-GPL version one do not get problems?
Of course it does matter. If Qt4Ada is GPL, you can't use it for CSS
even if you buy a Qt license.
For this reason I'd prefer something that is GTK+ based. And I
consider GtkAda under GPL like the tail wagging the dog. After all
GTK+ does the real work and it is LGPL. Now comes one of a dozen or so
language bindings and shows people how to do Free Software.
--
Michael Bode
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-29 21:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-29 10:34 Qt4Ada: Qt for Ada Yves Bailly
2006-07-29 12:35 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-29 17:03 ` Preben Randhol
2006-07-29 17:44 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-07-29 21:50 ` Michael Bode [this message]
2006-07-29 18:17 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-29 19:11 ` Samuel Tardieu
2006-07-29 14:24 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2006-07-31 20:57 ` Yves Bailly
2006-08-01 2:08 ` Jeffrey Creem
2006-08-03 7:51 ` Rob Norris
2006-08-01 11:35 ` Philippe Bertin
2006-08-01 21:55 ` Yves Bailly
2006-08-05 19:47 ` Steve Whalen
2006-08-05 21:25 ` Michael Bode
2006-08-06 9:24 ` Georg Bauhaus
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox