From: Mehdi Saada <00120260a@gmail.com>
Subject: interfaces and limited/controlled/limited-controlled types
Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2018 08:21:09 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2018-01-25T08:21:09-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ea190839-2f83-4dbb-9064-8d6f535cc1d0@googlegroups.com> (raw)
Is it only because of history and compatibility issues, that Limited_Controlled and Controlled aren't rewrote as interfaces ?
Like: T_type is limited new Ancestor_type with Controlled
or T_type is new Ancestor_type with Limited_Controlled
Or is there a semantic issue too ?
next reply other threads:[~2018-01-25 16:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2018-01-25 16:21 Mehdi Saada [this message]
2018-01-25 22:00 ` interfaces and limited/controlled/limited-controlled types Robert Eachus
2018-01-26 4:58 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-01-26 8:28 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-01-26 11:17 ` Alejandro R. Mosteo
2018-01-27 7:12 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-01-27 14:04 ` Jere
2018-01-27 14:38 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2018-01-27 18:28 ` Jere
2018-01-29 23:05 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-01-29 23:03 ` Randy Brukardt
2018-01-31 11:54 ` Alejandro R. Mosteo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox