Re: 'withing' problem

["DuckE" <nospam_steved94@home.com>]

I believe you'll find in the original post that the intent is not to "move
code"
but rather to support another language with a program generation
tool.

SteveD

"Preben Randhol" <randhol+abuse@pvv.org> wrote in message
news:slrn9u5sln.v0j.randhol+abuse@kiuk0156.chembio.ntnu.no...
> On Fri, 02 Nov 2001 17:19:17 GMT, Ed Falis wrote:
> > I believe the original poster said he was moving (automatically?) code
> > from a language such as Java to Ada, where the lack of spec and
> > implementation separation leads naturally to mutually dependent
> > classes.  In such languages, this is not necessarily bad design.
>
> No, but either moving code automatically or not, one ought to redesign
> in Ada in order not to get into this problem with withing. I find it an
> odd approache to change the language you are moving code *to* in order
> to fit features in the language one is moving the *code* from! The code
> should change not the language.
>
> Preben Randhol
> --
> Please, stop bombing civilians in Afghanistan. One cannot write off
> killing innocent children and other civilians as "collateral damage".
> A civilian is a civilian whether he or she is American or from another
> country in the world.           http://web.amnesty.org/11september.htm