From: Michael Bode <m.g.bode@web.de>
Subject: Re: Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0
Date: Sat, 22 Jul 2006 18:06:31 +0200
Date: 2006-07-22T18:06:31+02:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e9tie7$e14$1@online.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ptslku4vi4.fsf@hod.lan.m-e-leypold.de
M E Leypold <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de> writes:
> What I got, finally, was the following statement:
>
> "Let me be clearer, the only assumption you can make today for GtkAda downloaded
> from the libre site in the past is that it is licensed under the GPL."
>
At this point I would be seriously worried if I were a paying customer
of Adacore. What if they suddenly change their licenses for the Pro
versions too? What if that already *has* *happened* at some point in
the *future*? You need a whole new English grammar to describe this
"time travelling license".
This is a company I would definitively never buy from.
--
Michael Bode
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-07-22 16:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-07-21 19:18 Answer of Request to AdaCore on licensing Status of GtkAda 2.4.0 M E Leypold
2006-07-22 16:06 ` Michael Bode [this message]
2006-07-22 21:46 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-23 9:24 ` Michael Bode
2006-07-23 4:54 ` Hyman Rosen
2006-07-24 23:23 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-25 9:01 ` michael bode
2006-07-25 16:37 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-07-25 21:42 ` Björn Persson
2006-07-26 9:58 ` Steve Whalen
2006-07-26 11:08 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-07-26 12:54 ` michael bode
2006-07-26 13:59 ` Georg Bauhaus
2006-07-26 14:05 ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-07-26 14:10 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-07-26 14:31 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-07-26 18:12 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-07-27 11:01 ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-07-30 0:16 ` Steve Whalen
2006-07-25 17:35 ` Simon Clubley
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox