From: sbelmont700@gmail.com
Subject: Re: Anonymous access types are evil, why?
Date: Wed, 28 Aug 2013 13:16:19 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2013-08-28T13:16:19-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e855e87a-9f29-4746-955b-b13e8b8b50f7@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aa5e84e5-24e0-4b8c-8904-c76b00a4d60a@googlegroups.com>
On Wednesday, August 28, 2013 7:49:56 AM UTC-4, ake.ragna...@gmail.com wrote:
>
> What are the conclusions we can draw?
>
If you are going to use an AAT, always make sure you have a valid reason for doing it and understand the ramifications. They are a specific tool for providing specific behavior in specific circumstances, not just a general syntax shortcut to avoid having to properly declare your types.
-sb
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-28 20:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-28 11:49 Anonymous access types are evil, why? ake.ragnar.dahlgren
2013-08-28 16:10 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-08-28 21:10 ` Randy Brukardt
2013-08-30 7:29 ` ake.ragnar.dahlgren
2013-08-30 15:17 ` Adam Beneschan
2013-08-30 17:04 ` Robert A Duff
2013-08-28 20:16 ` sbelmont700 [this message]
2013-08-28 21:10 ` Shark8
2013-08-30 16:16 ` Gerhard Rummel
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox