Re: Ariane5 FAQ, 3rd draft

[aek@vib.usr.pu.ru (Alexander Kopilovitch)]

Wojtek Narczynski wrote:

> > A. There are several points which are different
> > for Ariane 5 vs. Ariane 4, (...)

>IMHO, this is *the* answer. And thanks for posting it.

Note though, that this "A" in the FAQ is essentially a copy of
Francisco Malpartida's posting (from 21 Jul 2003,
Message-ID: <3f1c374f$0$11375$cc9e4d1f@news.dial.pipex.com>),
with very slight editorial changes.

>The no.1
>question would be "Why did it crash?". Would you consider putting it
>as the first one? The rest just fill in the details, or - depict the
>climate.

Various people may have different views about what is most interesting
(or most hot) question in the Ariane 5 launch failure story. Surely
there may be various designs for this FAQ. I didn't make any design
at all, so far the FAQ is developed by "natural way" -- every time when
I see new info deserved to be included, or a gap to be filled, I add new
Q-A pair, inserting it at the place that seems suitable at that moment.
I don't think that I'm going to make any particular design for the FAQ,
mainly because I have no grounds for that. But this does not prevent any
people to propose their own (full) designs, and even to take over with
whole this burden -:) .



Alexander Kopilovitch                      aek@vib.usr.pu.ru
Saint-Petersburg
Russia