Re: Question: How do I establish a (.exe) program link for immediate calling of my cipher programs from a computer desktop say.

[MM <mrvmurray@gmail.com>]

Hi

You have a terminology problem which makes you harder to understand.

> Question: How do I establish a (.exe) program link for immediate calling
> of my cipher programs from a computer desktop say.

Programs are not "established"; they are "compiled (and linked)" or "built".

The term "a (.exe) program link" should just be "an executable program".

The term "immediate calling" has no meaning, but I guess you intend to
say "running". Programs are "run" or "executed", not "called".

The relevance of the desktop is unclear.

---

You also ask things that are contrary to your actions or contradictory:

On Friday, 6 March 2015 09:05:02 UTC, Austin Obyrne  wrote:
> My interest alone is in the core cipher programs that I write and store
> away in folders in my computer and I would like to make these programs
> more portable locally here at home.

This is a contradiction; either "portable" or "locally here at home", pick one.
Portability implies another place which you do not make known. It could be
customers or co-workers for example. (I suspect you mean the folks who
download your stuff; if so, best make that explicit).

> Apart from being a very good problem solver in Ada I have no pretention of
> being able to 'mix it' with the heavier developers in your group so I have no
> compunction about humbly slapping my soul on the table in this matter.

What does this mean? I don't know what "slapping your soul on the table"
means, but I suspect it is more hyperbole for humility that you never follow
up on. Folks have offered to help you fix your code and make it more
usable, and you have rejected *ALL* such offers.

My offer of a clean rewrite of your ciphers stands. You can have it and do
what you like with it.

> I need to be able to do this as de rigueur in future with finished work because
> I want to make my stuff to be more transparent and user-friendly.

This is good, if you want others to read and understand your code. It will also
help you do the same and make your programs easier to maintain. The words
you wrote, however, are harder to follow than they need to be. The "de rigueur"
doesn't fit properly.

> Your help as always would be appreciated.

Promise?

M