From: AdaMagica <christ-usch.grein@t-online.de>
Subject: Re: Idiomatic formatting for empty package
Date: Tue, 10 Oct 2017 03:21:01 -0700 (PDT)
Date: 2017-10-10T03:21:01-07:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e2af184b-ec15-4924-8360-a5784a7b8ac4@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <orhrsl$e9d$1@dont-email.me>
Am Dienstag, 10. Oktober 2017 09:12:23 UTC+2 schrieb Jeffrey R. Carter:
> ... I think the purpose of Ada was namespace
> control: Where before we had a bunch of pkgs using up names we might want to
> use, after we had a single hierarchy under Ada. (Of course, the Ada-83
> compatibility renamings undo that.) ...
But those renamings don't clutter the user's namespace since the names may be used for user-created packages: RM J.1(10), AARM A.2(4.a).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-10-10 10:21 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-10-04 21:36 Idiomatic formatting for empty package Victor Porton
2017-10-04 22:10 ` Victor Porton
2017-10-05 5:27 ` Re : " Pascal Obry
2017-10-05 18:10 ` marciant
2017-10-05 23:37 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-06 20:04 ` marciant
2017-10-07 1:55 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-05 23:36 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-06 8:47 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-10-07 1:52 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-07 6:55 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-10-09 21:45 ` Randy Brukardt
2017-10-10 7:12 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-10-10 10:21 ` AdaMagica [this message]
2017-10-10 14:34 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2017-10-10 17:38 ` AdaMagica
2017-10-05 23:49 ` andrewshvets
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox