From: Adam Beneschan <adam@irvine.com>
Subject: Re: Type of the target of an assignment shall not be abstract
Date: Tue, 16 Feb 2010 08:12:02 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2010-02-16T08:12:02-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e26d58d5-36f1-4566-9e9a-b1b0595a4a45@u19g2000prh.googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: bb14092c-3a1a-48fd-88de-69bf8b719ed6@g19g2000yqe.googlegroups.com
On Feb 16, 2:03 am, Gautier write-only <gautier_niou...@hotmail.com>
wrote:
> On 16 Feb., 01:59, Adam Beneschan <a...@irvine.com>:
>
> > FYI, I asked about this on Ada-Comment, and got a response from
> > Randy. [...]
>
> Thanks!
> IHMO, no need to worry about how well or not the standard handles
> that.
> To answer my original question, can I conclude that GNAT is wrong on
> that case, and that I can send a report ?
Yes, if GNAT is accepting this, then it's wrong.
-- Adam
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-16 16:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-14 14:20 Type of the target of an assignment shall not be abstract Gautier write-only
2010-02-14 17:57 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2010-02-15 17:05 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-02-15 19:00 ` Hibou57 (Yannick Duchêne)
2010-02-23 21:19 ` Robert A Duff
2010-02-16 0:59 ` Adam Beneschan
2010-02-16 10:03 ` Gautier write-only
2010-02-16 12:14 ` Gautier write-only
2010-02-16 16:12 ` Adam Beneschan [this message]
2010-02-28 17:00 ` Gautier write-only
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox