From: Austin Obyrne <austin.obyrne@hotmail.com>
Subject: Re: Why I Say Ada is the Ideal Language for Cryptography.
Date: Mon, 23 Dec 2013 09:39:34 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2013-12-23T09:39:34-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e26bbe3b-9042-4a93-a6bf-92e7603cce3b@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <fed44176-a8b7-4d4a-92be-6029b1061e2f@googlegroups.com>
On Monday, December 23, 2013 3:37:08 PM UTC, inga....@verizon.net wrote:
> On Sunday, December 22, 2013 7:54:34 AM UTC-6, Austin Obyrne wrote: > The fact that NSA owns the Ada language > > Complements of the Season to everybody. > > Austin Please provide an additional explanation of what precisely you mean by this. Since your focus and NSA's focus are both cryptography, are you saying that all Ada cryptography libraries come from the NSA? If not that interpretation, then what do you mean? And what evidence of this "ownership by the NSA" can you offer?
I stand corrected - I should have said the US Departemet of Defense - the NSA own nothing to do with Ada - apologies to anybody who has taken offence.
Austin
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-12-23 17:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-12-22 13:54 Why I Say Ada is the Ideal Language for Cryptography Austin Obyrne
2013-12-22 18:15 ` Dirk Heinrichs
2013-12-23 15:37 ` inga.miller
2013-12-23 17:39 ` Austin Obyrne [this message]
2013-12-23 19:33 ` inga.miller
2013-12-24 0:23 ` Austin Obyrne
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox