From: Marius Amado-Alves <amado.alves@gmail.com>
Subject: Re: Delays for implementations of Fortran features
Date: Sun, 19 Jan 2014 03:54:26 -0800 (PST)
Date: 2014-01-19T03:54:26-08:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <e15dba8b-7437-4abc-8f34-ffbefccb7aef@googlegroups.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d0713f85-d6de-44be-85a5-7fc2e2a1c075@googlegroups.com>
"I think that the original poster is saying that Ada and Fortran share a common problem: some non-open-source compilers are not seeing the investment this decade that that they saw in prior decades, due in turn to lower revenues." (Miller)
Yes, and the conclusion would be: get used to--and use--open source, and make money some other way.
But, there seems to be an important difference between the two open source communities: GNAT is quickly maintained w.r.t. to the language revision, whereas GFORTRAN is not (as reported above).
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2014-01-19 11:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2014-01-18 12:40 Delays for implementations of Fortran features Colin Paul Gloster
2014-01-18 13:03 ` Simon Clubley
2014-01-18 14:37 ` Colin Paul Gloster
2014-01-18 15:20 ` Simon Clubley
2014-01-19 4:07 ` Dan'l Miller
2014-01-19 11:54 ` Marius Amado-Alves [this message]
2014-01-19 12:59 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-01-19 13:03 ` Nasser M. Abbasi
2014-01-19 13:26 ` Bill Findlay
2014-01-19 13:50 ` Simon Clubley
2014-01-19 14:06 ` J-P. Rosen
2014-01-19 14:51 ` Dennis Lee Bieber
2014-01-20 10:19 ` Marius Amado-Alves
2014-01-25 15:44 ` darek
2014-01-25 21:46 ` darek
2014-01-20 10:15 ` Marius Amado-Alves
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox