comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Maciej Sobczak <no.spam@no.spam.com>
Subject: Re: private types
Date: Tue, 21 Mar 2006 08:41:57 +0100
Date: 2006-03-21T08:41:57+01:00	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <dvoao5$sqq$1@sunnews.cern.ch> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4672587.DAoJQAFo3c@linux1.krischik.com>

Martin Krischik wrote:

>>The interesting question is why it might make any difference to you?
>>The only thing that really matters is that the null pointer is distinct
>>from any other valid pointer, in which case it's equivalent to Ada's
>>null.
> 
> For C++ I can - barely - see that but C is supposed to system programming
> language suitable for kernel and/or embedded progamming. Taking that into
> account: How actually are the languages implementers to implement 
> "distinct from any other valid pointer".

Any way they want.

> If you are implementing a Ring 0
> device driver on x86 all pointers are valid and on PC architecture there is
> memory at (void*0) which one might want to access.

The point is that if you are writing software for some specific piece of 
hardware, then handling of NULL is the least of your problems. You need 
extensive knowledge and guarantees, considering, among others, stuff 
like word sizes, alignment, byte ordering, representation and existence 
of trap values, etc. In other words, you don't just pick any compiler at 
random, but rather you use the one which gives you the set of required 
guarantees. And among those guarantees there will be something about the 
NULL pointer.
Most likely you will just know that the NULL pointer has representation 
of all bits zero.

Note also that in so called reality compilers that do not implement NULL 
as zero just do not sell very well. This is because many C programmers 
are used to do this:

struct S
{
     int x;
     char *p;
     /* ... */
};

struct S s;
memset(&s, 0, sizeof(S));  /* <- here */

and later expect that s.p == NULL;

The "idiom" of memsetting structures is so deeply rooted in the C 
community that you can find it in almost every C program and most C 
books. It's clear that the "idiom" bypasses the typesafety of fields by 
just plowing over their underlying representation, and this can work 
only with those compilers that do not exercise the full freedom that the 
standard gives them.

So - no worry. It just works. :)


-- 
Maciej Sobczak : http://www.msobczak.com/
Programming    : http://www.msobczak.com/prog/



  reply	other threads:[~2006-03-21  7:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 93+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2006-03-13 19:58 private types ada_student
2006-03-13 20:27 ` Mark Lorenzen
2006-03-13 21:05   ` Pascal Obry
2006-03-13 21:07   ` ada_student
2006-03-13 21:45     ` Simon Wright
2006-03-14  4:51 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-14  7:44   ` Brian May
2006-03-14  8:25     ` Ludovic Brenta
2006-03-14  8:47     ` Alex R. Mosteo
2006-03-17  4:33     ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-17  5:17       ` Brian May
2006-03-17 22:50         ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-18  1:17         ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-18  2:17           ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-21  0:08             ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-18  8:39           ` Uninitialized variables (was: Re: private types) Dirk Craeynest
2006-03-18 14:06             ` Gautier
2006-03-18 14:36               ` Uninitialized variables Jeffrey Creem
2006-03-21  0:22             ` Uninitialized variables (was: Re: private types) Randy Brukardt
2006-03-21  0:38             ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-18 12:06           ` private types Martin Dowie
2006-03-18 12:47           ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-17  7:40       ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-17 16:41         ` Frank J. Lhota
2006-03-17 23:36         ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-18  1:32           ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-18  3:21             ` Handling invalid objects Justin Gombos
2006-03-18  7:35               ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-18 16:10                 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-19 11:00                   ` Simon Wright
2006-03-20 23:57                   ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-22  2:06                     ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-22  5:23                       ` tmoran
2006-03-22  8:48                         ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-22  9:24                           ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-22 11:05                             ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-22 16:42                               ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-22 18:06                                 ` Stefan Lucks
2006-03-23 13:20                                 ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-18  8:57               ` Jacob Sparre Andersen
2006-03-19 19:07                 ` Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2006-03-20 15:25                   ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-19 22:06               ` Brian May
2006-03-20 21:17                 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-20 23:44               ` Randy Brukardt
2006-03-22  1:27                 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-18  9:20           ` private types Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-17 13:18       ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-17 23:44         ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-18  9:24           ` Dmitry A. Kazakov
2006-03-18 12:56           ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-18 15:06             ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-19  9:35               ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-19 14:52                 ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-03-19 15:08                   ` Björn Persson
2006-03-19 16:34                     ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-20  9:57                       ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-20 10:58                         ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-03-20 11:19                           ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-03-20 13:06                           ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-20 15:19                         ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-20 16:47                           ` James Dennett
2006-03-20 19:12                         ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-21  7:27                           ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-20 19:32                         ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-21  7:41                           ` Maciej Sobczak [this message]
2006-03-20 20:29                       ` Simon Wright
2006-03-19 17:43                     ` Larry Kilgallen
2006-03-19 22:11                     ` Peter C. Chapin
2006-03-19 18:15                 ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-19 19:20                   ` Martin Krischik
2006-03-19 20:43                     ` Dr. Adrian Wrigley
2006-03-20 15:01                       ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-27  4:07                       ` Dave Thompson
2006-03-20  9:40                     ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-20 15:09                       ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-21  8:07                         ` Maciej Sobczak
2006-03-26 18:53                           ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-19 19:27                 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-25 21:40               ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-26  0:10                 ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-26  1:00                   ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-26  6:37                     ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-26 15:43                       ` Justin Gombos
2006-03-26 16:32                         ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-26 16:51                       ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-26 19:41                         ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-26  3:15                 ` Frank J. Lhota
2006-03-26 18:28                   ` Robert A Duff
2006-03-26 19:43                     ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2006-03-26 19:59                     ` Simon Wright
     [not found] <bctruong.1.00117123@draper.com>
1999-07-28  0:00 ` Stanley R. Allen
1999-07-28  0:00   ` Thomas Hood
replies disabled

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox