Re: Puzzling small piece of code - exception block essentially used as goto

[Markus E Leypold <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de>]

> On 2007-06-06, Markus E Leypold <development-2006-8ecbb5cc8aREMOVETHIS@ANDTHATm-e-leypold.de> wrote:
>>
>> I can understand why you're posting as "Anonymous Coward" :-).
>
> Are you implying that the quality of the code is reasonable, and the
> one opposed to it should be a coward for objecting to it?  Or are you
> saying the code quality is poor, and the author should be a coward?

No. I'm implying that you're probably in this instance are swimming
against the main current of a corporate policy and therefore wouldn't
want to have this episode/request associated with your name. Apart
from implying that a colleague wrote bad code and refuses insight in a
code review (bad attitude for a professional). However true that might
be -- saying it in public in a way that your company might be
identified, perhaps even the colleague, that might be taken ill by
your employer or your colleague.

Or -- why ARE you posting as AC?

:-)

Regards -- Markus