From: Dale Stanbrough <dstanbro@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: ANNOUNCE: Ada success story in IEEE Software
Date: Tue, 08 Jan 2002 12:12:02 GMT
Date: 2002-01-08T12:12:02+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dstanbro-FFA1D2.23113708012002@mec2.bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: ba18d5cb.0201080316.3954569b@posting.google.com
Rod Chapman wrote:
> It's the kind of system where most people
> would not even consider Ada, but we found its use to be a significant
> factor in the success of the project. The final system achieved
> 0.04 defects per kloc (that's 4 defects in 100,000 lines of code) post-
> delivery, which compares favourably with industry norms.
I'm not sure I follow this. If this result is the industry norm,
and most of industry doesn't use Ada, then why do you think Ada
was "a significant factor in the success of the project"?
Dale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-08 12:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 20+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-08 11:16 ANNOUNCE: Ada success story in IEEE Software Rod Chapman
2002-01-08 12:12 ` Dale Stanbrough [this message]
2002-01-08 12:48 ` Martin Dowie
2002-01-08 14:20 ` Ted Dennison
2002-01-09 21:16 ` Jeffrey Carter
2002-01-09 21:28 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-01-09 21:46 ` Pat Rogers
2002-01-10 15:12 ` Wes Groleau
2002-01-10 15:38 ` Pat Rogers
2002-01-08 14:58 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-01-08 17:45 ` Rod Chapman
2002-01-08 19:43 ` Larry Kilgallen
2002-01-11 10:37 ` Ian
2002-01-11 12:03 ` Larry Kilgallen
[not found] ` <ce804us8gj7mfcdpo5529m490ihichrg4a@borpin.co.uk>
2002-01-14 15:33 ` John English
2002-01-14 22:42 ` Rod Chapman
2002-01-16 12:50 ` John English
2002-01-17 8:49 ` Rod Chapman
2002-01-17 10:18 ` John English
2002-02-06 10:10 ` Rod Chapman
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox