From: Dale Stanbrough <dstanbro@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: Visibility of private packages??
Date: Wed, 14 Aug 2002 09:53:41 GMT
Date: 2002-08-14T09:53:41+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dstanbro-E13D57.19534014082002@news-server.bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: uljbq1j7cqsa8f@corp.supernews.com
Randy Brukardt wrote:
> Yes, AI-262, "private with". Already approved by the ARG. The example
> would be written in Ada 0Y as:
>
> private package a.b is
> type hidden is <something>
> end a.b;
>
> private with a.b;
> package a.c is
> type not_hidden is private;
> private
> type not_hidden is new a.b.hidden;
> end;
>
> Randy Brukardt
Excellent! Time to drag out some old programs.
Does anyone know if any compiler vendors have implemented this
yet? (and more significantly for me, has Gnat implemented it?).
I tried it out on the Mac port (which calls itself GNAT 5.00w)
but it objected.
Dale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-08-14 9:53 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-07-30 21:23 Visibility of private packages?? Peter Coventry
2002-07-31 9:13 ` John McCabe
2002-07-31 12:06 ` Dale Stanbrough
2002-07-31 13:30 ` Robert A Duff
2002-08-14 1:16 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-08-14 9:53 ` Dale Stanbrough [this message]
2002-08-14 17:03 ` Robert Dewar
2002-08-14 19:42 ` Randy Brukardt
2002-07-31 11:55 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2002-07-31 13:22 ` Mark Doherty
2002-07-31 17:43 ` Anh_Vo
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox