From: Dale Stanbrough <dstanbro@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: Interfacing to C library...
Date: Sun, 03 Nov 2002 09:28:28 GMT
Date: 2002-11-03T09:28:28+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dstanbro-7EC8B8.20281903112002@mec2.bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: wccfzujvm21.fsf@shell01.TheWorld.com
Robert A Duff wrote:
> >...I think I like the
> > GNAT Import_Function()/Import_Procedure() pragmas a little better,
> > since they facilitate finer control over the parameter passing method.
> > However, I'd rather not use compiler specific capabilities...
>
> Good idea. (At least *I* think portability to non-GNAT compilers is
> good, in part because I work for SofCheck, which sells non-GNAT Ada
> compilers. ;-))
How do other compiler companies deal with this issue? My guess is that
a lot of code is written with Gnat, and very little of it is compiled
with the "no gnat pragmas" option set.
Is there a trend to incldue Gnat pragmas in all other compilers?
Dale
prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-11-03 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-11-01 15:38 Interfacing to C library Eric G. Miller
2002-11-01 17:11 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-01 17:40 ` tmoran
2002-11-02 5:10 ` Eric G. Miller
2002-11-02 6:02 ` tmoran
2002-11-02 16:10 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-02 18:35 ` Eric G. Miller
2002-11-02 18:55 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-02 23:59 ` Eric G. Miller
2002-11-03 16:47 ` Robert A Duff
2002-11-03 18:55 ` Eric G. Miller
2002-11-03 9:28 ` Dale Stanbrough [this message]
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox