From: Dale Stanbrough <dstanbro@bigpond.net.au>
Subject: Re: Assertions in the Next Ada Standard
Date: Fri, 11 Jan 2002 09:23:02 GMT
Date: 2002-01-11T09:23:02+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dstanbro-07F79B.20222311012002@mec2.bigpond.net.au> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 3C3E8438.E780D942@adaworks.com
Richard Riehle wrote:
> I am hoping to see something like pre-conditions, post-conditions,
> and invariants in the next revision of Ada. I would be pleased if
> we simply adopted the wording already used in Eiffel: require,
> ensure, and invariant, but I am not intractable about the terminology.
>
> So, who is working on the proposal for this?
>
> Richard Riehle
I think another valuable one would be "assume" which is an
assertion that allows the compiler to invoke any code
optimisation it can.
Dale
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2002-01-11 9:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2002-01-11 6:20 Assertions in the Next Ada Standard Richard Riehle
2002-01-11 9:23 ` Dale Stanbrough [this message]
2002-01-11 13:47 ` Robert A Duff
2002-01-11 23:28 ` Nick Roberts
2002-01-12 1:30 ` Darren New
2002-01-11 20:07 ` FGD
2002-01-11 20:39 ` Wes Groleau
2002-01-12 4:56 ` Robert Dewar
2002-01-12 7:30 ` Richard Riehle
2002-01-12 19:58 ` FGD
2002-01-12 21:27 ` Ed Falis
2002-01-12 22:45 ` Darren New
2002-01-14 17:20 ` Robert A Duff
2002-01-14 17:42 ` Darren New
2002-01-14 23:16 ` Mark Lundquist
2002-01-17 6:23 ` Richard Riehle
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox