From: "Pat Rogers" <progers@classwide.com>
Subject: Re: with child: access to parent
Date: Tue, 02 Oct 2001 14:44:25 GMT
Date: 2001-10-02T14:44:25+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dpku7.7997$QW3.3699542158@newssvr11.news.prodigy.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 9pcip8$8vt$2@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de
"Peter Hermann" <ica2ph@iris16.csv.ica.uni-stuttgart.de> wrote in message
news:9pcip8$8vt$2@infosun2.rus.uni-stuttgart.de...
> Marc A. Criley <mcqada@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Which means that
>
> > with pak.child;
>
> > is equivalent to:
>
> > with pak;
> > with pak.child;
>
> thank you.
> 10.1.2(6) does not clearly state this fact.
You asked for the rule, not the exegesis! :-) :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2001-10-02 14:44 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 15+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2001-10-02 10:06 with child: access to parent Peter Hermann
2001-10-02 10:49 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-02 12:53 ` Marc A. Criley
2001-10-02 14:25 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-02 14:44 ` Pat Rogers [this message]
2001-10-02 14:10 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-02 14:17 ` Ted Dennison
2001-10-02 15:17 ` Wes Groleau
2001-10-02 16:14 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-12 13:58 ` Simon Wright
2001-10-02 14:22 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-08 10:51 ` Jean-Pierre Rosen
2001-10-11 15:07 ` Peter Hermann
2001-10-11 14:54 ` Pat Rogers
2001-10-03 0:34 ` dale
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox