comp.lang.ada
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* Is the Army beginning its switch to C++  ?????
@ 1995-02-28 16:11 Gregory Aharonian
  1995-03-01  3:14 ` Dave Marshall
  0 siblings, 1 reply; 2+ messages in thread
From: Gregory Aharonian @ 1995-02-28 16:11 UTC (permalink / raw)



    Is the Army beginning its switch over to C++?  In the February 1995
issue of Application Development Trends, pg 15, the following item appeared:

	"The U.S. Army selected CSDC/Ontos system from Ontos Inc.,
	Burlington, MA, for its new data access and decision-support
	information system designed to streamline equipment maintenance
	procedures.  Estimated to save $4.4 million in the first year
	of a three-year project, the new system was developed by
	Computer Systems Development, Chantilly, VA, based on Ontos'
	component object technology".

With savings like that, can the rest of the Army be far behind?  I wonder
if this is some economic experiment Emmett Paige ordered to test out the 
it-doesn't-conflict-with-the-Ada-Mandate COTS policy that opens up all of
the DoD to C++ products like Ontos' object oriented databases?  I wish I
could have sat in on the Ada Summit session where they talked about this
issue.

What percentage of the DoD is still using Ada???????????????

Greg Aharonian




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

* Re: Is the Army beginning its switch to C++ ?????
  1995-02-28 16:11 Is the Army beginning its switch to C++ ????? Gregory Aharonian
@ 1995-03-01  3:14 ` Dave Marshall
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 2+ messages in thread
From: Dave Marshall @ 1995-03-01  3:14 UTC (permalink / raw)


srctran@world.std.com (Gregory Aharonian) writes:


>    Is the Army beginning its switch over to C++?  In the February 1995
>issue of Application Development Trends, pg 15, the following item appeared:

>	"The U.S. Army selected CSDC/Ontos system from Ontos Inc.,
>	Burlington, MA, for its new data access and decision-support
>	information system designed to streamline equipment maintenance
>	procedures.  Estimated to save $4.4 million in the first year
>	of a three-year project, the new system was developed by
>	Computer Systems Development, Chantilly, VA, based on Ontos'
>	component object technology".

>With savings like that, can the rest of the Army be far behind?  I wonder

It's hardly clear from your excerpt where the savings are coming from.  I 
have no particular axe to grind, so it seems to me that the $4.4M saving 
may be from "streamlin[ing] equipment maintenance procedures," not 
necessarily from using C++ rather than Ada.

-- 
Dave Marshall
dmarshal@netcom.com




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 2+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~1995-03-01  3:14 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 2+ messages (download: mbox.gz / follow: Atom feed)
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
1995-02-28 16:11 Is the Army beginning its switch to C++ ????? Gregory Aharonian
1995-03-01  3:14 ` Dave Marshall

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox