From: Dennis Lee Bieber <wlfraed@ix.netcom.com>
Subject: Re: Efficient Bit Vector Manipulation.
Date: Sat, 16 May 2015 13:12:15 -0400
Date: 2015-05-16T13:12:15-04:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dhuela9cldb9k8niin3bt925ao9k82uf2j@4ax.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: alpine.LNX.2.00.1505151444550.16030@anapnea.net
On Fri, 15 May 2015 14:48:37 +0200, Colin Paul de Gloucester <not@real.com>
declaimed the following:
>Hello,
>
>The code which yields the most efficient output from one compiler
>might not yield the most efficient output from another compiler, and
>vice versa.
>
Especially if one has data stored in the bit-banded overlay of an ARM
MCU.
--
Wulfraed Dennis Lee Bieber AF6VN
wlfraed@ix.netcom.com HTTP://wlfraed.home.netcom.com/
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2015-05-16 17:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2015-05-15 12:07 Efficient Bit Vector Manipulation Vincent
2015-05-15 12:48 ` Colin Paul de Gloucester
2015-05-16 17:12 ` Dennis Lee Bieber [this message]
2015-05-15 16:26 ` Niklas Holsti
2015-05-16 11:58 ` vincent.diemunsch
2015-05-15 16:58 ` Jeffrey R. Carter
2015-05-16 12:06 ` vincent.diemunsch
2015-05-17 13:55 ` robin.vowels
2015-05-18 7:53 ` Stefan.Lucks
2015-05-18 11:43 ` vincent.diemunsch
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox