From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Storage_Error with parameterized records
Date: 1998/07/07
Date: 1998-07-07T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.899850282@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 359F50D9.5126DEE1@cl.cam.ac.uk
Markus said
<<> which just goes to show how this keeps puzzling people. Presumably Markus
> expected an implicit heap implementation here,
Yes, indeed.
>>
Well nothing could show more clearly how it is not at all obvious what the
right choice is. Markus just assumed the heap would be used implicitly,
whereas some embedded user last week (sorry I forget whom) used this
(implicit heap usage in this situation) as an example of vendors ignoring
users and doing silly things :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-07-07 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-07-03 0:00 Storage_Error with parameterized records Markus Kuhn
1998-07-04 0:00 ` Pascal MALAISE
1998-07-05 0:00 ` david.c.hoos.sr
1998-07-08 0:00 ` Robert A Duff
1998-07-08 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
[not found] ` <dewar.899586342@merv>
[not found] ` <359F50D9.5126DEE1@cl.cam.ac.uk>
1998-07-07 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1998-07-10 0:00 ` Samuel Mize
1998-07-13 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox