From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Ada and UNICODE?
Date: 1998/05/25
Date: 1998-05-25T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.896120618@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: 87yavr71d9.fsf@yakisoba.forte-intl.com
Ronald COle said
<<Has it succeeded? I seem to recall at least one kanji character where
the Japanese and the Chinese disagree on the radical and therefore
it's KUTEN position. And there still appears to be many as-yet-
ununified kanji in the Unicode encoding. Personally, I evidence the
seeming reluctance on the part of kanji users to fully embrace it, and
so I conclude Unicode to be just another step on the way towards a
truly unified kanji. However, not having been formally schooled with
kanji, I am unable to offer any actual personal insight or opinion on
the "han unification".
>>
By success here, I mean ratification of the ISO 10646 standard. For
a while it looked like this would be deraield.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-05-25 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-05-15 0:00 Ada and UNICODE? William A Whitaker
1998-05-15 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-05-18 0:00 ` Joel VanLaven
1998-05-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-05-19 0:00 ` Ronald Cole
1998-05-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-05-24 0:00 ` Ronald Cole
1998-05-25 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1998-05-20 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
1998-05-20 0:00 ` Larry Kilgallen
1998-05-20 0:00 ` Markus Kuhn
1998-05-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox