From: dewar@merv.cs.nyu.edu (Robert Dewar)
Subject: Re: Question about garbage collection
Date: 1998/04/28
Date: 1998-04-28T00:00:00+00:00 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <dewar.893738151@merv> (raw)
In-Reply-To: Es39LE.B5o@world.std.com
Bob Duff said
<<The literature on so-called conservative GC is full of tricks to make
the probability of false-rentention lower, such as black-listing. But
it still makes me nervous. On the other hand, octopus GC without
compaction (or manual memory management without compaction) can cause
trouble, too, unless you're dealing with fixed-size blocks. There's no
silver bullet -- memory leaks are possible no matter what.
>>
I disagree, it is quite possible to put bounds on possible
fragmentation effects ....
next prev parent reply other threads:[~1998-04-28 0:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
1998-04-18 0:00 Question about garbage collection Centaury
1998-04-18 0:00 ` Matthew Heaney
1998-04-19 0:00 ` Ed Falis
1998-04-19 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-04-20 0:00 ` Fergus Henderson
1998-04-20 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-04-21 0:00 ` raw
[not found] ` <ErqJro.9BI@world.std.com>
1998-04-21 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
1998-04-21 0:00 ` William Tanksley
[not found] ` <ErvsM0.Bu7@world.std.com>
1998-04-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
[not found] ` <Es39LE.B5o@world.std.com>
1998-04-28 0:00 ` Robert Dewar [this message]
1998-04-24 0:00 ` Robert Dewar
replies disabled
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox